Need Help? 734-318-7053

Blog Post

THE LATEST WINNING BRIEF: EB-2 NIW APPROVED FOR A CLIENT IN THE AREA OF SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGIES


Cover Image

The Law Office of Akintunde F. Adeyemo, PLLC has successfully represented a client in the above-cited area. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) delivered the Approval Notice to the firm’s address over the weekend.



 

Having shared this life-changing news with our client — an academically gifted (graduating with a perfect 4.0 grade point average, a member of the Honors program) and extraordinarily brilliant engineer — who was super excited to hear that his EB-2 (NIW) petition was approved by the USCIS, the firm would like to provide more insights into this case.




This case, which the firm filed on February 12, 2025 (USCIS confirmed receipt on February 14, 2025), was expedited using the premium processing option (USCIS charges a separate fee to adjudicate a case within 45 days). The quick adjudication has no bearing on the outcome of the case, so think twice before making that expensive decision. Have this discussion with your attorney.



 

EB-2 (NIW) is an employment-based second preference (EB-2) - National Interest Waiver (NIW) petition, and it is one of the statutorily approved ways for qualified foreigners to become permanent residents in the U.S., and, subsequently, become U.S. citizens. For EB-2 (NIW), your location is irrelevant (the ultimate question is: can you satisfy the requirements under the Matter of Dhanasar, inter alia)? For our client who is in the U.S., as in the case at hand, his Green Card will be processed in the U.S. via the Adjustment of Status filing.



  

Our client — whose highest level of education at the time of filing was a Master of Science degree in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering (his M.S. work focused on controls and autonomy and his current employment is in the application of these skills in the area of mechatronics for semiconductor fabrication processes) — is a lead senior systems engineer at one of the world's leading chipmakers and suppliers for the semiconductor industry. In fact, the firm provided verifiable evidence showing, among other things, his meritorious scholarship awards. In drafting the legal brief, we specifically focused on his demonstrable unique skills and accomplishments in enhancing the performance and reliability of Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines. By optimizing EUV lithography systems, our client plays an indispensable role in improving the efficiency, precision, and productivity of semiconductor manufacturing.



Inter alia, documenting his progressive accomplishments, which he accumulated in the United States, and connecting that to the national interest of the United States, the brief survived all the three prongs.



 

The brief argued, inter alia, that his proposed endeavor — contributing to the advancements of semiconductor manufacturing technologies, with a specific focus on enhancing precision and productivity of semiconductor manufacturing processes by improving the capabilities of Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines that are crucial in the production of advanced computing chips will lead to projected future contributions by addressing issues that the United States has deemed to be of substantial merit and national importance.



In addition to his work on improving machine reliability, our client has spearheaded an important project utilizing computer vision techniques to assess the survivability of fast-moving mechanical components under high-stress conditions. He also developed a testing framework that incorporated advanced image processing algorithms to track deformation and calculate strain rates in components subjected to high accelerations. We provided evidence showing that his work was recognized by the Development and Engineering Department as one of the most impactful contributions of the quarter. With his other verifiable track record of successfully executing (and currently involved in developing an advanced algorithm to filter out false alarms from temperature sensors within the EUV machines) complex projects in the United States, as corroborated by distinguished professors and industry leaders with first-hand knowledge of his contributions, our client is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor, the brief argued.

 


 

In drafting this brief, the firm had multiple touchpoints with the client. Understanding what the client does is very critical to filing an NIW brief. Moreover, by providing verifiable evidence, the brief argued that the client — whose goal is to enhance the precision and productivity of semiconductor manufacturing, specifically through improving the capabilities of EUV lithography machines, which are crucial in the production of advanced computing chips — is the kind of talent that will advance the national interest of the United States. Based on our understanding of the client’s work, the brief focused on this key area — enhancing EUV lithography machines. Leveraging verifiable evidence, the brief explained that our client’s past and current accomplishments are clearly indicative of his future contributions. The brief also showed that our client has maintained a relentless commitment to addressing real-world engineering challenges that are of significant importance to the United States.

 

 



Additionally, the carefully written 36-page brief cited, as well as analyzed, different applicable laws, regulations, and pertinent evidence to corroborate the assertions. NIW cases are tricky, so you need to consider hiring a law firm/lawyer that understands all the nuances of the law. Before drafting every brief, we do comprehensive research on the AAO’s website, as well as review the Kurzban’s Immigration Law Sourcebook: NIW cases are won on the merit of the argument. Factual and legal arguments. In fact, it is an evidence-based petition. As in the case at hand, the firm submitted verifiable evidence showing that our client possesses an impressive record of success in his field of specialty. To support this brief, the firm submitted 66 exhibits.



 

As a matter of fact, there was no RFE request, for the legal brief survived all the three prongs of the analytical framework in the precedent decision Matter of Dhanasar, 26 I&N Dec. 884 (AAO 2016): (1) that his proposed endeavor has both substantial merit and national importance; (2) that he is well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor; and (3) that, on balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the requirements of a job offer and thus of a labor certification. And the brief established that he satisfied each eligibility requirement of the benefit sought by a preponderance of the evidence. Matter of Chawathe, 25 I& N Dec. 369, 375-76 (AAO 2010).


 

To satisfy the third prong of Dhanasar, relating to the question of whether it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the requirements of a job offer, and thus of a labor certification, the brief argued, inter alia, that his contributions to the field will undoubtedly benefit the United States. This is the trickiest legal analysis under the Matter of Dhanasar. There are lots of denied cases via the Administrative Appeals Office, so the firm usually considers the third prong as equally important as the first two prongs. Here, the legal analysis focused on three of the factors enumerated by the Dhanasar Court: (1) whether, in light of the nature of our client’s qualifications or proposed endeavor, it would be impractical either for our client to secure a job offer or for him to obtain a labor certification; (2) whether, even assuming that other qualified U.S. workers are available, the United States would still benefit from our client’s contributions; and (3) whether the national interest in our client’s contributions is sufficiently urgent to warrant forgoing the labor certification process. This analysis is critical to winning an NIW case. You can read more about the Matter of Dhanasar on the firm’s website: www.akinalaw.com.



 

With this crucial phase now over, and while waiting for the priority/final action date to kick in, our client will continue his work in the areas implicated in the proposed endeavor. This is a big win for the amazing Team at the firm. Most importantly, this is a big win for our client: a step closer to the American dream.


 

Again, congratulations to our client!

 

The Law Office of Akintunde F. Adeyemo, PLLC is now accepting new clients in the areas of EB-2 (NIW) and EB-1A.

 

To read more about EB-2 (NIW), visit: https://www.akinalaw.com/blog/11/a-permanent-residency-option-for-foreigners

 

To read more about EB-1A, visit: https://www.akinalaw.com/blog/18/eb-1a-frequently-asked-questions

 

For a free (100%) case evaluation for EB-1A/EB-2 (NIW), contact the attorney-in-charge of The Law Office of Akintunde F Adeyemo, PLLC:

 

Akintunde F. Adeyemo, Esq.

Attorney, Counselor & Solicitor

734-318-7053 (Call, Text, Including WhatsApp)

Website: www.akinalaw.com

Email address: info@akinalaw.com


#eb2niw #immigrationlawyer #immigrationattorney

 

***FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. PAST SUCCESS DOES NOT INDICATE THE LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESS IN ANY FUTURE LEGAL REPRESENTATION***


***ATTORNEY ADVERTISING***